Strategi Pembelajaran SD/MI

Penulis

  • Ade Rahayu Institut Agama Islam Abuya Salek Sarolangun, Indonesia
  • Dewi Anjarsari Universitas Sragen, Indonesia
  • Kumaidi Kumaidi Universitas Islam Sarolangun, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54723/ejpgmi.v5i1.659

Kata Kunci:

strategi pembelajaran, SD/MI, pembelajaran aktif, studi literatur.

Abstrak

Pembelajaran yang efektif pada jenjang Sekolah Dasar dan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (SD/MI) menuntut pemilihan strategi pembelajaran yang sesuai dengan karakteristik peserta didik, tujuan pembelajaran, serta konteks pendidikan. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara komprehensif berbagai strategi pembelajaran yang relevan untuk SD/MI, meliputi Problem Based Learning, Project Based Learning, Contextual Teaching and Learning, model pembelajaran kooperatif (Jigsaw, Student Teams Achievement Divisions, Teams Games Tournament, Two Stay Two Stray, dan Numbered Heads Together), Inquiry Learning, Discovery Learning, Role Playing, pendekatan SAVI, serta Reward and Punishment. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode studi literatur dengan menganalisis artikel jurnal ilmiah bereputasi dan buku akademik yang relevan dalam kurun waktu kurang lebih 15 tahun terakhir. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa setiap strategi pembelajaran memiliki karakteristik, kelebihan, dan keterbatasan masing-masing, sehingga tidak terdapat satu strategi yang bersifat universal dan paling efektif untuk seluruh konteks pembelajaran. Strategi pembelajaran aktif dan kooperatif cenderung efektif dalam meningkatkan keterlibatan, keterampilan berpikir, dan kemampuan sosial peserta didik SD/MI apabila diterapkan secara terencana dan terbimbing. Artikel ini menegaskan pentingnya peran guru SD/MI dalam memilih dan mengombinasikan strategi pembelajaran secara reflektif dan kontekstual untuk menciptakan pembelajaran yang bermakna dan sesuai dengan kebutuhan peserta didik.

Referensi

Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does discovery-based instruction enhance learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021017

Arends, R. I. (2012). Learning to teach (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Gillies, R. (2016). Cooperative Learning: Review of Research and Practice. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(3), 39–54. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n3.3

Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586

HMELO-SILVER, C. E., DUNCAN, R. G., & CHINN, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and Achievement in Problem-Based and Inquiry Learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368

Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: what it is and why it’s here to stay. In Choice Reviews Online (Vol. 40, Issue 02). Corwin Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.40-1053

Joyce, B., Weil, M., & Calhoun, E. (2015). Models of teaching (9th ed.). Pearson Education.

Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka: Kerangka dasar dan struktur kurikulum. https://kurikulum.kemdikbud.go.id/

Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016a). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733

Krajcik, J. S., & Shin, N. (2014). Project-Based Learning. In The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences (pp. 275–297). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139519526.018

Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-Analysis of Inquiry-Based Learning. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681–718. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315627366

Mayer, R. E. (2021). The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (R. E. Mayer & L. Fiorella (eds.)). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108894333

Rusman, R. (2014). Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Rajawali Pers.

Sani, R. A. (2019). Pembelajaran Berbasis HOTS (High Order Thinking Skills). Tira Smart. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=GrfrDwAAQBAJ&printsec=copyright&hl=id#v=onepage&q&f=false

Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, and Practice. Allyn and Bacon. https://books.google.co.id/books/about/Cooperative_Learning.html?hl=id&id=GWnuAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & van der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031311

Xiao, Y., & Watson, M. (2019). Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 39(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X17723971

Yew, E. H. J., & Goh, K. (2016). Problem-Based Learning: An Overview of its Process and Impact on Learning. Health Professions Education, 2(2), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hpe.2016.01.004

Zed, M. (2014). Metode penelitian kepustakaan (Edisi revisi). Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Unduhan

Diterbitkan

2026-04-30

Cara Mengutip

Rahayu, A., Anjarsari, D. ., & Kumaidi, K. (2026). Strategi Pembelajaran SD/MI. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Al-Amin, 5(1), 625–653. https://doi.org/10.54723/ejpgmi.v5i1.659

Terbitan

Bagian

Articles